Main content
Games Shop

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3
Reviewed by: Joaby
08:41pm 08/11/11
7 member comments

Genre: First Person Shooter
Developer:
Publisher:
Classification: MA15+
Release Date: 8th Nov 2011
Platforms: XBOX360


9.5
Ga Rating Picture

0
MEMBER RATING:
Average of 50 Ratings

Login to submit your review score
While the previous Modern Warfare games were definitely aimed at a mature audience, it's hard to imagine anyone describing them as "mature". The staccato way they flitted from one thought to the next spoke as much to the small attention span of its audience as it did about it.

Screenshot
The storyline across the games was less an attempt to convey an idea and more an excuse to push the player from one high-octane set-piece to the next - all the while making sure the action increased exponentially until six-ish hours later you finished the game, exhausted.

What happened at the beginning? What happened in the middle? ****, what happened at the end? The games skip through so many ideas it's tough to recall - all you remember is you had fun. It's all part of the illusion the master magicians have created - the idea is that you never have a chance to stop to think about anything.

Modern Warfare 3 isn't quite like that - but it's different in a positive way. It's mature. It still jumps perspectives, characters and locations constantly, but it's paced in a way which allows you a chance to breathe - a chance you rarely got in previous games.

The epic set pieces aren't always about bigger and better explosions this time, either. Some - including one fantastic level on a plane - are less about sprinting to the next 'marker' and are more about appreciating the level design.

The game started with a warning about one of the levels containing graphic content - as did Modern Warfare 2 before the now famous "No Russian" level - and I'm happy to say that even here there is evidence of an increased maturity. It's still a bit shocking, but there's an element of restraint which adds to the legitimacy of the event.

The story begins in the shoes of US Delta Force Staff Sergeant Derek "Frost" Westbrook as he fights through the streets of New York - the inadvertent poignancy of the occupation of Wall Street paid no mind - but quickly drags things to Africa so we can reacquaint ourselves with Task Force 141.

You might remember 'Soap' being mortally wounded at the end of Modern Warfare 2 - apparently it wasn't yet his time to die, but instead of seeing through his eyes again you become Yuri Petrenko as they track Makarov's actions through Africa.

Screenshot
In Europe, SAS Officer Sergeant Marcus Burns is leading the charge as he tries to track down details of an apparent terrorist plot and he immediately finds himself involved in a high octane chase with an ending reminiscent of Die Hard: With a Vengeance.

There are other playable characters I won't reveal to save from spoiling the game for you, but with these three characters you'll find yourself travelling across the world - well, across Europe, North America and Africa at least.

Like I said, the story is remarkably well paced this time - when it ends you'll still feel exhausted, but you'll remember every bit. It's the best Call of Duty single player yet, and it's ultimately an extremely satisfying ending to the Modern Warfare series.

At 6-ish hours long though, Modern Warfare 3's singleplayer is just a drop in the ocean - as in previous games in the series, the multiplayer is where the bulk of MW3's entertainment is at - and I can say without any doubt - it is the best multiplayer shooter on console today.

Let's talk cooperative multiplayer first, because this year's effort is both significant and important. Infinity Ward still won't create a 'zombies' mode - that's still Treyarch's baby - but they made a concession with the addition of Spec Ops Survival mode.

Screenshot
Like an amalgam of Zombies and Gears of War's Horde mode, it pits the player (and his coop friend) against wave after wave of enemies. The maps used are the maps you'll use in multiplayer, but the items available to you are ones you've unlocked in Spec Ops only. This means you'll start out relatively boned - you've got bugger all weapons, killstreaks or explosives, so you wind up very aware of the losing battle you and a friend are fighting.

As you work through the levels in Survival mode though, you slowly unlock more weapons and items - eventually unlocking things like turrets and the ability to call in Delta Force AI - and you begin to feel a little invincible. It's around this time that the game really starts to throw everything it's got at you.

I can very clearly remember the way my heart was thumping when three Juggernauts (guys with Light Machine Guns in basically Bomb Disposal armour) arrived on the scene. They downed my colleague, so i had to lure them away from him and sprint to his body and revive him before he 'died'. I made it with literally seconds to spare, and they'd returned just as I finished getting him back on his feet. We sprinted away and called in an air strike - all three died in an explosion from a Michael Bay film, and we carried on to the next round.

The normal Spec Ops missions are still in the game - offering in many cases an alternate version of scenes from the single player campaign. The great thing is you still increase your Spec Ops Survival level in this mode, further incentivising you and a friend to try it out.

As much fun as I had playing Spec Ops, you know where the bulk of MW3's multiplayer is - the competitive game modes. This year Infinity Ward and Sledgehammer Games have taken significant steps to give the game more of a team-focus, and once again it's a testament to the maturity on display with MW3.

Screenshot


Take the game modes, for example. TDM and FFA still exist, but the introduction of modes like Team Defender and Kill Confirmed - specifically designed to refocus the individualism of TDM and FFA - paints a clear picture of the thinking at work at IW.

Also reshaping how players work together are the new streak rewards. The typical killstreak system is still in place, essentially designed to make the (frag) rich richer as good players gradually unlock bigger and better assists (like Helicopter gunships or being the gunner in an AC-130).

Screenshot
The Specialist streak gives you more perks - which means in addition to your current set up you might find yourself running faster, or invisible to UAVs, or that your bullets do more damage - but to be honest I didn't see it have a great utility to me or my team.

The biggest new addition is the Support streak. The first thing to note is that the Support streak doesn't reset when you die - which means as long as you can get 18 frags in a match, you'll make it to the best possible reward. The Support streak rewards are all primarily team focused - you're able to call in UAVs, care packages and even a Juggernaut suit of armour, replete with a riot shield (amazing when you've got the flag in Team Defender).

The focus is on getting players to make their team win - not just on winning themselves - and it actually really works.

There are other changes to the game's make-up as well - especially in how your weapons work. As well as your account levelling up, your weapons now level up through use, replacing the challenge system from previous games. As you use a weapon you unlock more perks and attachments for it - forcing you to make a tough decision when you unlock something different.

Weapons is actually one area wherein Modern Warfare 3 makes a serious misstep, in my opinion. While playing it quickly became apparent that the single most important stat for any weapon was Rate of Fire. The weapon with the highest rate of fire would typically win any one-on-one encounter - and in the right hands it can win most other encounters as well.

Screenshot
This means that the best weapon for almost any situation is the PP-90M1 with the Rapid Fire attachment. An SMG trumps every Assault Rifle, every LMG and... everything, really. My primary class build was based around the Overkill perk (equip two primary weapons), a PP-90M1 and a UMP, both with Rapid Fire. If you throw Sleight of Hand (reload and switch weapons quicker) and Steady Aim (increased accuracy when firing from the hip), you're basically a one man army.

Weapon imbalance aside though, everything else about MW3's competitive multiplayer screams quality at a level other games simply cannot match. There's an attention to detail apparent here most other titles can't compete with, because Infinity Ward has had the time to whittle away almost anything which doesn't work.

The menu system, the create-a-class system - everything you do before you actually start playing adds up to a flawless experience. Once in-game, the maps are all carefully balanced for each game mode, with multiple routes to all areas and major firefight zones always clear.

This sort of painstaking detail and refinement has come at the cost of the game's graphics though - despite some fantastic lighting it's difficult to hide the aging Call of Duty engine, especially compared to other games coming out around it.

Still, I've never been hung-up on graphics - good enough is good enough where I'm concerned. It's always been about the atmosphere where I'm concerned - how the graphics, story-telling, sound and voice acting combine to put the player in the moment.

Screenshot
Modern Warfare 3 is no slouch in that department. The likes of Idris Elba (The Wire, Luther), Timothy Olyphant (Deadwood) and William Fichtner (Prison Break) join the team from the previous games to totally sell you on the story, and the sound of your environment - while not the best out there - still delivers on a spectacular level.

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 really is the best multiplayer shooter on console right now. It's not changing the landscape of shooters - it's honing it to its sharpest point. It's a no-brainer purchase for console gamers, and there's very little to complain about regarding it.

Overall, MW3 exhibits remarkable maturity, and it will deliver it to an audience renowned for its immaturity. There's a chance it might even be a good thing for video games culture. Whether it is or not doesn't matter though - it's a great ride and a fantastic ending to the series.



Disclosure - GameArena attended a review event in Los Angeles to make sure our review came out on time.
Comments
2.0
Game Comment by BulldoG^

Doesn't feel like a progression in any way.
There are way too many 12 year olds that shouldn't be playing this that it spoils the MP section beyond enjoyable. I'm guessing all the reviewers played this with dev's rather than the actual public that has ruined it so far. Sure it's fun with friends, but have a look at how many Aussies play this compared to Americans....very few & none of my friends bought into this edition.
Spec Ops is a nice deviation, but short lived & the campaign is nothing short of rehashed man down, buddy revives you, set pieces galore..rinse repeat.

Unfortunately Joaby, as most other critic reviewers, seem to be completely out of touch with actual gamers on this one. Have a look at Metacritic if you need proof.

And the worst part, I got the Hardened edition so I guess I'm keeping it untill November.
As for CoD in general, I'm done with this cash cow...stop milking it to death already.


_ _
Game Comment by midago

The multiplay is where the heart of COD has always been and improved with every game, that is up till modern warfare 2. Iw net in mw 3 is better than previous, faster, more sucsessful party migration with friends. Personally i go for the dedicated servers. This is simply because latley the iw net seems to be overrun with mindless cheating, wall hackers, aimbots, esp hacks, and just recently rank hacks. This is what spoils a great game. So i found it really frustrating to play iw net when i could go to a dedicated server with no poor host connection and an admin that could rid the server of any such cheats. One other thing is the poor post launch support the mw 3 forums are filled with genuine issues (along with angry gamers that are just abusive). And no one from the dev team are replying as to what is being done. Sad that smaller companies can hang around in thier forums and give live support. Look i bought it and was probably hoping that the selling point for me, the promise of dedicated servers would work. However the gameplay is good.


0.5
Game Comment by ArkticWolf

This game is MW2-2. As others have written, it feels as though they just repackaged the same engine - and I'm nearly certain they have.

They could have changed the arsenal, updated some meshes and textures, but nope. It's really just a Modern Warfare 2 expansion pack. The animation is clunky, there's next to no dynamic phsyics.... It's just... Modern Warfare 2-2. As others have written, it feels as though they just repackaged the same engine - and I'm nearly certain they have.

They could have changed the arsenal, updated some meshes and textures, but nope. It's really just a Modern Warfare 2 expansion pack. The animation is clunky, there's next to no dynamic phsyics.... It's just... Modern Warfare 2.

I played Spec-Ops with my housemate for a few hours which managed to be of quite some fun - until we got out of sync. Twice. First time rendered us unable to continue unless we exited the game, the second time dropped us back out until the menu, resetting us back to the first wave.

The thing that /really/ irritates me is Activision's love of the game lobby. It doesn't work, and therefore joining games was a giant pain in the butt. Getting into a game was just as bad as MW2, and the three games I managed to get into, the host had to be 'migrated' and each time failed, dropping us back to the menu.

This, coupled with the fact that Activision wants to force you to unlock basic multiplayer game modes (I can't even play hardcore until I reach level 16. WTF?!) makes the MW3 multiplayer experience akin to drinking a litre of draino.

I feel ripped off, and buying this game was an absolute horrid mistake of a purchase as I played it for <5 hours, and that's how it'll stay. Disappointing (and pretty insulting) slap in the face for the consumer.

$100 well wasted.


3.0
Game Comment by K3ZA

My main gripe with new games is still not fully supporting Eyefinity setups, CoD MW3 seems to have been developed with the priority on Consoles using a single display - Eyefinity support basically isnt there, for both mw3 and BF3 for that matter.
Although in bf3 it kind of works it's still full of bugs such as not being able to tell each side apart due to missing colour icons that normally float over your head, and it's full of other issues that prevent it from being worth using.
CoD MW3 is much worse though, It can not do eyefinity correctly at all - instead of adding the extra image on the two outside monitors, it just zooms in to fit the width and cuts off the top and bottoms making it utterly useless.

External apps like 'Widescreen Fixer' help but it still doesnt look right.
Eyefinity has been around for long enough now and should be supported!

The gameplay is more like an expansion pack and not a whole new game! It's pretty much the same old thing as far as the content goes, except for me it just dont seem to feel right - it doesnt 'gel' with me, requring me to adjust the way i play, Not that i'd want to but it would probably feel better if using a xbox controller!

I will continue to play and try hard to like it - for a while at least hopefully it will grow more on me.


1.5
Game Comment by mattiev21

Yeah I said it, Treyarch outperformed in comparison with Black Ops for really bringing something fresh to the game.

MW3 is basically an overpriced expansion pack for MW2, and not worth the money they charge for the game.

Matchmaking with friends on Live, doesn't really, well work...

There are no real new innovations to the game itself, and it even looks like they haven't even refined the IWEngine, just repackaged it.

I feel let down, and F$$#@D royally and basically have the impression that this release was nothing more than revenue grabbing... Make the game cheap as, and maximise.

I'm also in the mindset that I would prefer to play Black Ops than MW3


_ _
Game Comment by Draken

So angry with how much this game cost, and how little it delivers.

It feels clunky, there's marginal improvements over MW2, and looks like the first hacks are already out.

(Oh look, already on sale at several outlets, why did I preorder?)

The game itself isn't bad, but it belongs in 2007, not 2011. Throw in the immature playerbase, and the game's just not fun.

All hype, no delivery. It looks like Activision spent more money paying off review sites and promoting the game, than on developers for the game.

Lost faith in review sites, thought it would be a good game going by all the 9.5 and 10 scores, but this game's going to be forgotten very very soon.


4.0
Game Comment by s.aberhart

When it comes to the Fight between MW3 and BF3, it is a really technical battle.

For story I'm sure MW3 will take the cake as it has a long line of previous campaigns to keep it on its feet. But
BF3 came in this round with a wild haymaker that connected well with it's "Tarintino" style story, Amazing cinematics and brand new game engine compared to MW3's Game engine that has pretty much been the same since COD 4 give or take a few upgrades.... Old Software New patches... like Having Windows XP in 2011 it's stable sure... but it's still ridiculously out of date and won't get far when it comes to innovation.

I played BF3 first obviously because it was released earlier, and was amazed at the cheeky new game engine glistening in the light like a diamond in the rough, shooting enemies cover away so i could feed them lead easier, large scale combat zones, Immersive audio and beautiful scenery. While it had a few bugs sure, they are always bound to happen in new software but it was all quickly forgiven with it's sheer genius of it all.

I played MW3 a mere few minutes ago and was so sorely disappointed, the enemies moved around like wooden cut-outs and dropped so suddenly with little to no ragdoll effects at all and it sounded like I was playing a game from 2004 with the horrible sound effects... cover was in-penetrable and at the start I was in a room full of glass and found it entertaining to shoot the glass displays like ducks at a range... alas I had the horrible thought to think that shooting the glass on the roof would aid in killing my foe... Nay. it was glass made from the magical dwarfs of middle earth that was nigh unbreakable.

So i played another hour and was so sorely disappointed when **** didn't break, fall over or explode.

Other critics give it 10/10 or 9/10 simply because if they don't then they'll be stoned and whipped in public for being "too picky" but f#*$ that.

I give BF3 9.5/10 simply because of the bugs it loses 0.5 but that is all fixable. where-as MW3 gets a measly 4/10, lack of immersion, predictable story, ***** sound and unrealistic fire fights left me with a lump in my throat like a half swallowed penicillin when you just want it to go away.


Add a comment

You need to be logged in to add a comment.
 
Advertisement
Facebook Activity
Day of Defeat
Day of DefeatDay of Defeat
1
Immunity
4 wins 0 losses
2
Morgue Fillers
5 wins 1 loss
3
BushMasters
16 wins 36 losses
4
Pact of Steel
4 wins 2 losses
5
_( ^ )_
9 wins 4 losses
Quake 3 Urban TerrorQuake 3 Urban ...
Day of Defeat: SourceDay of Defeat:...
Call of Duty 8v8Call of Duty 8v8
SoldatSoldat
Battlefield 1942Battlefield 1942
Call of Duty 4Call of Duty 4
TeamFortress ClassicTeamFortress C...
Team Fortress 2Team Fortress 2
Counter-Strike: SourceCounter-Strike...
Feedback Form