Main content
gameNOW

Battlefield 3

Battlefield 3
Reviewed by: Joaby
10:59pm 23/10/11
20 member comments

Genre: First Person Shooter
Developer:
Publisher: EA
Classification: MA15+
Consumer Advice: Game deals with issues or contains depictions which require a mature perspective
Release Date: 20th Oct 2011
Platforms:


9.5
Ga Rating Picture

0
MEMBER RATING:

Login to submit your review score
Single player shooters are like a magician's show. They're an active lie that both the viewer and the artist is allowing to happen for the sake of entertainment. A good magician deceives his audience, making them believe in magic - even if only for a second, until they remember that despite what the Insane Clown Posse would have you believe, magic isn't in fact everywhere. Or anywhere.

Screenshot
A good single player game needs to deceive its audience as well. The lies being told are many; the enemies are 'intelligent', they exist beyond the scope of the game, your character exists, and so does his world.

Battlefield 3 does an OK job of selling this lie - but too often it shows its hand, ruining the illusion. You'll see enemies appear from nowhere, you'll watch them move through their fixed, rigid patterns when they should be reacting to your actions. The confines of the maps will display themselves too, reminding you that you are playing a video game.

It's not the first game to make these mistakes - and it won't be the last - but it's disappointing to see. BF3 isn't DICE's first attempt to inject a singleplayer campaign into the series, but where they succeeded previously is in playing by their own rules. BFBC2 for example didn't have the most amazing SP campaign ever, but at least it was still a Battlefield experience (though lessened to an extent).

BF3's mistake is that it is playing by Call of Duty's rules. Where the Bad Company series was a light-hearted, joke-filled excuse to get players acquainted with the various weapons and vehicles in the multiplayer, BF3 is a tense and serious thriller, taking place across multiple countries and told from the perspective of a few different characters.

Screenshot
The story is actually quite good. The primary character is Sgt. Henry Blackburn - he's being interrogated over the death of his CO on mission. Along the way you'll fill the boots of Lt. Jennifer Hawkins (seriously) as she asserts Air Superiority over the skies of Iran, Sgt. Jonathan Miller - a tank commander - and Dimitri Mayakovsky, a GRU Operative with more than just Russia's interests at heart.

Some of the levels are great - everything you do in Paris, for example, highlights the best of what Battlefield 3 is offering. Others - like Lt. Hawkins - are little more than on-rails tag-alongs. It seems odd that in a series where the biggest draw is the ability to pilot/drive vehicles you're given so little opportunity to do exactly that.

It's not as if the ability to fly jets isn't present in the multiplayer, after all. Instead of forcing the player to simply watch as the AI flies - and occasionally having to shoot another plane down - why not let the player come to grips with how piloting works elsewhere in the game?

Screenshot
Still, it's not as if you need to see 63 other players in a game before you'll be allowed to pilot a vehicle. One of the first coop maps, for example, is a Helicopter flying mission, and it's a great introduction to the new flying mechanics in BF3.

The coop missions, in fact, are probably the highlight of the non-competitive Battlefield 3 experience. There are only six missions but there's clearly a lot of love (and variety) in each one, and they really manage to break up the BF3 experience.

The voice-acting is surprisingly solid most of the time, and I was surprised when the score showed not only that it had more than just the iconic Battlefield sound - it includes some genuinely good music.

Still, the real highlight of Battlefield 3 is the sound effects - and the game sounds brilliant. It's not just about the gun chatter sounding realistic, or each distinct vehicles roar being spot on - the soundscape changes depending on where you are and what's going on around you, and it's completely immersive.

If a rocket crashes into the wall next to you, exploding, you'll notice the temporary tinnitus washing out all other sounds around you. A tank navigating the urban canyons of the Seine Crossing map sounds more ominous than one careening across the desert in Noshahr Canals.

The game looks gorgeous, too. The realistic animations and the attention to detail in terms of physics creates this atmosphere which sucks you right into the game - but the star is the lighting. The flashing lights of a cop car in the Co-Op map 'Drop 'Em Like Liquid' bathes everything in an intermittent blue. The orange flame from a newly blown up tank dynamically changes your world to have a red hue. These lights will change, too - shoot out those flashing lights and the world will return to normal.


Screenshot


Overall, the non-competitive experience in Battlefield 3 isn't the greatest. Instead of trying to wage a war on Call of Duty's terms DICE would have been better served to emphasise what we already know they're great at - the best large scale multiplayer on the goddamn planet.

Luckily, DICE apparently dumped a **** load of emphasis into giving Battlefield 3 the best large scale multiplayer in any game you've ever played.

Screenshot
The multiplayer experience of BF3 begins with Battlelog. Granted, all BF3 experiences start here, but it's crucial to the MP, because through the Battlelog you can team up with friends, organise parties, start the built-in VOIP and choose a server. You can sort by mode, region, number of players, expansion pack support - if there's a specific server you want to play on and it exists, you'll be able to find it.

A lot of hate has run the way of Battlelog, but if you ask me it's a crock of ****. Thanks to the server browser being... browser based, it takes mere seconds for the game to sort through all your parameters to find you somewhere to play. Even as recent as BFBC2 I can recall 30 - 40 second waits while the game found servers.

Once you decide to join a server, Battlelog reserves you a spot in the server, starts the game and you get connected. Just like that.

In-game, the fun really starts. Conquest mode is a battle to control up to five spots across a usually quite large map. Maps like Seine Crossing or Grand Bazaar perfectly capture the urban warfare feeling so many loved in the likes of Strike at Karkand, while Kharg Island and Caspian Border will remind you of the sheer size available to Battlefield gamers.

Screenshot
The Rush game mode gives players staggered objectives in the form of MCOM stations you either need to defend or blow up. This allows those with ADHD a little extra guidance in case they can't decide what they should be doing. Many are probably sick of Operation Metro as a Rush map - it was the only option for most of the Open Beta period after all - but I still enjoy seeing the landscape change dramatically as you move from objective to objective. Damavand Peak offers a similar experience - and it throws Base Jumping in the mix as well - while Nashahr Canals is a little more like the BFBC2 Rush experience... except you have A-10s flying overhead.

There's also Squad Rush, Squad DM and TDM - each one changes how the maps play out, and all of them significantly smaller as well.

The upgrade paths are different to BFBC2 or BF2 thanks to there only being 4 different classes. Assault/Medic gets the noob tube and the medpacks, Engineer gets access to rocket launchers, Stinger missiles and cool little robots, Recon scores sniper rifles and UAV support and the Support class gets Ammo packs, LMGs, explosives and the mortar.

The way they've redistributed the items amongst the classes is great for supporting teamplay - though the power of the M249 combined with the ability to infinitely refill your ammo does lend itself to a bit of a one man army situation.

Vehicles get upgraded too now, so it's not just your weapons which can earn new scopes or attachments. For the ground vehicles this is a great addition - it allows you to maximise your use of a tank or LAV - but for the jets it seems quite odd. For example - you don't have flares (used to shake off heat seeking missiles) or missiles until you unlock them. To unlock these things, you need kills - but getting kills is pretty difficult when all you have is a 30mm cannon.

The squad system - sorely missed in the beta - is back and working great in the full game. You can pick a squad and play with your mates, spawn on each other and tear up the game to the best of your shared abilities.

Screenshot
The Frostbite 2 engine is a thing of beauty. Not only does it allow all the dynamic lighting, fantastic soundscapes and massive maps I've already discussed - you can alt-tab without any issues, and it runs at a solid 100+ frames on my (admittedly quite beastly) PC. Loading times are tiny and the overall heat footprint is negligible. It performs what I consider to be quite significant tasks with ease - and that's impressive.

It's pretty easy when it comes down to it. If you're looking for an offline experience, look elsewhere. Battlefield 3 has a decent singleplayer - it's certainly better than some other games I've played recently - but it's not mind-blowing. If it's the best multiplayer game in the world that you're after, get your affairs in order. You're re-enlisting soldier.
Comments
_ _
Game Comment by Cocashot

I found all the additions to the game :
Armored Kill : http://filespeedy.net/download/4922/YzZiY
you check - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xn5w0SnL9j4


_ _
Game Comment by johndubos

what - no back to karkand with this? I have to pay $24 extra


_ _
Game Comment by REAPER8

The Setup of Game is crap.
Cant adjust anything unless ingame.
Gameplay is ok, Weapons ok.

Exapnsion Pack ????? What expansion pack - No one can or has played it yet. SO we paid ectra for that.
Graphics : Good - You need a good Video / graphics card to play and good memory.
It is Nothing Like Battlefield 2 for those who dont have it yet.


_ _
Game Comment by chilliman

no-one mentioned that graphics cards that easily ran BF2, BFBC2, Black Ops, MW2 etc will not run BF3. this is a massive letdown because all my gaming is on a Dell 1735 and the only way to upgrade the graphics card is to replace the integrated motherboard at the same time - around $600 cost.

before you buy make sure your graphics card will run the game or do like I did and get the Xbox360 version also.

regarding the Karkand expansion pack - it has not been released yet and I understand it will be operational in December.


10
Game Comment by s.aberhart

When it comes to the Fight between MW3 and BF3, it is a really technical battle.

For story I'm sure MW3 will take the cake as it has a long line of previous campaigns to keep it on its feet. But
BF3 came in this round with a wild haymaker that connected well with it's "Tarintino" style story, Amazing cinematics and brand new game engine compared to MW3's Game engine that has pretty much been the same since COD 4 give or take a few upgrades.... Old Software New patches... like Having Windows XP in 2011 it's stable sure... but it's still ridiculously out of date and won't get far when it comes to innovation.

I played BF3 first obviously because it was released earlier, and was amazed at the cheeky new game engine glistening in the light like a diamond in the rough, shooting enemies cover away so i could feed them lead easier, large scale combat zones, Immersive audio and beautiful scenery. While it had a few bugs sure, they are always bound to happen in new software but it was all quickly forgiven with it's sheer genius of it all.

I played MW3 a mere few minutes ago and was so sorely disappointed, the enemies moved around like wooden cut-outs and dropped so suddenly with little to no ragdoll effects at all and it sounded like I was playing a game from 2004 with the horrible sound effects... cover was in-penetrable and at the start I was in a room full of glass and found it entertaining to shoot the glass displays like ducks at a range... alas I had the horrible thought to think that shooting the glass on the roof would aid in killing my foe... Nay. it was glass made from the magical dwarfs of middle earth that was nigh unbreakable.

So i played another hour and was so sorely disappointed when **** didn't break, fall over or explode.

Other critics give it 10/10 or 9/10 simply because if they don't then they'll be stoned and whipped in public for being "too picky" but F*#$ that.

I give BF3 9.5/10 simply because of the bugs it loses 0.5 but that is all fixable. where-as MW3 gets a measly 4/10, lack of immersion, predictable story, ***** sound and unrealistic fire fights left me with a lump in my throat like a half swallowed penicillin when you just want it to go away.


7.0
Game Comment by drez13

OK so installing this game was a bit of a hassle. The last thing anybody needs is another game client. DICE tried this before with BF2142 expansion and it was an irritating and pointless exercise. Now they've decided to resurrect it - much the collective displeasure of PC gamers everywhere. We all already have STEAM, and it it far more polished/comprehensive than this new effort from DICE. Just imagine if every game developer brought out their own game client service that needs to run in the background. The new browser based server/stats interface is OK, but I don't really see the advantage here either.

The in-game menus, by contrast are a clearly a lazy console port. Trying to double click doesn't work, scroll doesn't work - this is incredibly lazy and sloppy user-interface design guys. Another hint - if you want your game not to look like a console port - don't put "press enter to continue" after the intro video

My initial impressions of the gameplay are almost completely obscured by the fact that once again, DICE have completely messed up the mouse control. This time there is no negative acceleration, but instead we have some "speed limiting bug" (do a google search for the thread on ea forums). This is incredibly irritating as it is even more aggressive than negative acceleration, and completely excludes quick aim adjustments.

DICE clearly don't understand just how important an intuitive mouse input is to PC gaming. This is especially irritating given the huge effort many PC gamers put into sorting out the mouse controls in BC2 via script editors etc (eg. BC2 mouse fix) only to find that with this new game they are back at square one. Personally I won't play this new game until this issue is sorted as it precludes my enjoyment of the title as well as my ability to play multiplayer intuitively.

I remember the trailers heralding this game as renewed focus from DICE to the PC market. Certainly the graphics department was focused on the PC, but that's about all in this game that appears geared toward PC gamers. Oh-and there appears to be a relative absence of (non-mouse related) bugs relative to DICE's other PC efforts

As far as what gameplay I have observed, maps appear varied with lots of open areas and choke points requiring varied tactics at different points of the game. The modelling and terrain on the maps is incredible. However, to me there are too many corridoors which then invites either explosives spam or excessive flanking. There is a lack of permeability or freedom of approach which was present in Bad Company 2. One cannot knock down the door of any given building to gain entry. This makes the game a bit predictable and static with the same choke points turning up again, and again, and again. This is not progress in this reviewer's opinion.

My second issue is the new obstacle physics. While I can appreciate that in real life one cannot walk on top of a thin fence (at least not in complete combat gear) this is not what I am used to, and one is constantly foiled in ones's movements either by a seemingly jumpable riser/low fence, or otherwise by the general profusion of 10 centimeter high rubble. This is irritating.

To me the singleplayer campaign seems liek quite a good effort. Sure the AI is kind of dumb and the story is linear but the scripting is fantastic, as are some of the action sequences. Overall though this is well short of a COD level of cinematic experience.

So overall is this game a COD-killer? Absolutely not, these games are in completely different categories with completely different gameplay characteristics. Will this game win back some of the disgruntled BF2 players who lost faith in the franchise - probably not given the flawed mouse controls. Will this game win over hardcore BC2 fans who love the permeability and freedom offered in BC2 maps - again no.

To me that only leaves A) casual PC gamers and B) console gamers unaffected by the mouse issues who I could recommend this game to. Swing and a miss DICE - I'm giving this 5 stars until they fix the mouse issue.


_ _
Game Comment by samuel_franklin

Expansion or not, Ultra end PC or not (eminenc3) this game is the most detailed and realistic first person shooter ever released. I am running the game on a Toshiba Satellite L750 with i5 CPU @ 2.3 GHz, 4GB of RAM and Geforce GT525 Graphics with the latest drivers (headphone sound so as not to annoy the Mrs.) The campaign ran perfectly on default settings @ 1366 x 768... Not the highest end graphic options, not low either. But still the most stunning FPS you will ever play... Multiplayer does not take anything away from the graphics quality experienced in the story mode. If your serious about realistic combat gaming then you need BF3...


_ _
Game Comment by eminenc3

Battlefield 3 draw you in more and more as time goes by, with an impressive line up of unlocks as you progress your character through all of them.

However, the game will be remember by the people who play it most by the Bugs and dramas the game has given them in trying to,
1) Install it
2) run it
3) Run it longer than 15-20 minutes.

The game is simply stunning to look at, you will need a high end PC to get the game to run at its peak, so be warned you will need to fork out well over 2-3,000 for a pc to run it in Ultra.

The single player campaign was and always has been somewhat of a sid dish in the otherwise mulitplayer dependent franchise.

Time and time again battlefield has come out with a Single Player Campaign, that many if not most of the people who play the multiplayer will never even touch in the over all long run.

Once the game has the bugs worked out and the servers start running better, we will be able to fully appreciate the awesome creation that is BF3..

For those looking to buy this game.
Be warned about the level of your PCs ability to play the game.
The imediate problems that surround this game at present
and of course the dramas you will have playing with Endless hordes of COD players who have no concept of tactics or skill.
Spray and Pray when u rush = death on this game very fast..


_ _
Game Comment by Bane

This is the full version of the game - however the EA version included the expansion pack.


_ _
Game Comment by samuel_franklin

All over the EA website it states that a pre-ordered copy of BF3 comes with the "Back to Karkland" expansion pack. I pre-ordered and downloaded my copy from Bigpond games on the 26th of Oct. Didn't have any issues with the install or activation but I can't find where this damn expansion pack is... does it just install with the full version or has it been left out of the Bigpond downloads???


_ _
Game Comment by sephira

@TwinkyBro if you're with Bigpond anything you download from the games shop or their movies etc is un-metered


_ _
Game Comment by TIGZ

File Size 14,086MB


_ _
Game Comment by carmaz

Is this download suitable for MAC?


_ _
Game Comment by TwinkyBro

How big is the actual download size?


_ _
Game Comment by Bane

If you have already downloaded the game – please go here https://secure.gamearena.com.au/account/shop/gamesandguides.php for an updated key.

If you are about to buy the game then you can download and install the game, you just won’t be able to play until the 27th.


_ _
Game Comment by Bane

If you buy BF3 from here (Games Shop) you can pre-download it (unmtered for BP customers) and install it. The key which is provided by EA will activate on the 27th.

If you have any questions - please raise a support ticket - by clicking the help link on the top right of the site.


_ _
Game Comment by 762x51

Is anyone having trouble installing this version? Can it even be installed?


_ _
Game Comment by ArkticWolf

Wait, so can we download the game after purchasing it through here unmetered or not?


_ _
Game Comment by cougar

Recommend you don't buy the game until the 27th of October. I did and the game key supplied will not let you re-install the game, which it should. Which makes me wonder if it will allow install on the 27th of October at all. I've raised a ticket with gameshop on this.


_ _
Game Comment by cougar

Recommend you don't buy the game until the 27th of October. I did and the game key supplied will not let you re-install the game, which it should. Which makes me wonder if it will allow install on the 27th of October at all. I've raised a ticket with gameshop on this.


Add a comment

You need to be logged in to add a comment.
 
Advertisement
Facebook Activity
Battlefield 1942
Battlefield 1942Battlefield 1942
1
Black Hofmanns
0 wins 0 losses
2
F#ck the Army
0 wins 0 losses
3
The iNub Regulars
0 wins 0 losses
4
=Dogs Of War=
2 wins 1 loss
5
ATA
0 wins 0 losses
Quake 3 Urban TerrorQuake 3 Urban ...
Call of Duty 8v8Call of Duty 8v8
Day of DefeatDay of Defeat
SoldatSoldat
Call of Duty 4Call of Duty 4
Team Fortress 2Team Fortress 2
TeamFortress ClassicTeamFortress C...
Counter-Strike: SourceCounter-Strike...
Day of Defeat: SourceDay of Defeat:...
Feedback Form